Kronospan
52 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Bischweier 1
19.07.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Employers with criticisms.
Bischweier 2
14.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Excellent activity. Fair payments. Recommendable workplace.
Bischweier 3
24.03.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Bischweier 4
13.07.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Bischweier 5
02.03.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Useful management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 6
13.08.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 7
24.04.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Interesting tasks. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 8
21.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 9
16.09.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 10
14.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 11
23.03.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 12
11.07.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 13
28.01.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 14
25.09.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 15
25.11.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 16
08.12.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 17
16.12.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 18
29.04.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 19
02.10.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 20
07.03.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 21
10.01.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 22
01.01.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 23
12.09.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 24
16.05.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 25
15.04.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 26
15.06.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 27
19.03.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 28
21.08.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Lamperdswalde 29
20.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Lamperswalde 30
16.05.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Lamperswalde 31
16.05.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Lampertswalde 32
29.03.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Not recommendable employer.
Lampertswalde 33
30.07.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Excellent activity. Fair payments. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Lampertswalde 34
02.08.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Excellent activity. Fair payments. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Lampertswalde 35
14.02.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Lampertswalde 36
30.07.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Lampertswalde 37
02.08.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Lampertswalde 38
22.10.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. High payments. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Lampertswalde 39
10.07.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Lampertswalde 40
10.06.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Good future prospects. Reasonable job provider.
Lampertswalde 41
21.04.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Sandebeck 42
27.08.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Sandebeck 43
12.06.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Reasonable job provider.
Sandebeck 44
09.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Not recommendable employer.
Sandebeck 45
05.02.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Satisfactory employment site.
Sandebeck 46
25.07.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Sandebeck 47
18.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Sandebeck 48
22.04.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Recommendable workplace.
Standebeck 49
25.09.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Steinheim 50
26.05.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Steinheim 51
10.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. First class salary. Best career opportunities. Recommendable workplace.
Steinheim 52
06.06.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
